“And he would have a decent chance of meeting the Supreme Court’s standard for mandamus relief, showing clear error on the part of the trial judge, a lack of an alternative remedy, and irreparable injury if the error is allowed to persist.”
Doesn’t he have that now? Isn’t her even considering including the irrelevant PRA in jury instructi…
“And he would have a decent chance of meeting the Supreme Court’s standard for mandamus relief, showing clear error on the part of the trial judge, a lack of an alternative remedy, and irreparable injury if the error is allowed to persist.”
Doesn’t he have that now? Isn’t her even considering including the irrelevant PRA in jury instructions, particularly with this latest decision/refusal of hers to say she won’t, obviously intended to set up a situation where there will be “lack of alternative remedy, and irreparable injury”?
Her “I’m just curious” whining in her decision is an obvious lie. Like someone pointing their gun sights at you and saying “I just want to see if the sights work. Im not planing to actually shoot you. Really, I’m not. Now just stand there while I load the gun.”
“And he would have a decent chance of meeting the Supreme Court’s standard for mandamus relief, showing clear error on the part of the trial judge, a lack of an alternative remedy, and irreparable injury if the error is allowed to persist.”
Doesn’t he have that now? Isn’t her even considering including the irrelevant PRA in jury instructions, particularly with this latest decision/refusal of hers to say she won’t, obviously intended to set up a situation where there will be “lack of alternative remedy, and irreparable injury”?
Her “I’m just curious” whining in her decision is an obvious lie. Like someone pointing their gun sights at you and saying “I just want to see if the sights work. Im not planing to actually shoot you. Really, I’m not. Now just stand there while I load the gun.”
Chilling