Are there official acts that are illegal? If these SCOTUS doofuses think the main distinction is between official and unofficial acts, rather than legal and illegal, there must be illegal official acts. Of course there aren't illegal official acts, so they should keep it simple: if it's illegal, it's unofficial and no immunity. Done.
Are there official acts that are illegal? If these SCOTUS doofuses think the main distinction is between official and unofficial acts, rather than legal and illegal, there must be illegal official acts. Of course there aren't illegal official acts, so they should keep it simple: if it's illegal, it's unofficial and no immunity. Done.
Are there official acts that are illegal? If these SCOTUS doofuses think the main distinction is between official and unofficial acts, rather than legal and illegal, there must be illegal official acts. Of course there aren't illegal official acts, so they should keep it simple: if it's illegal, it's unofficial and no immunity. Done.